Fill Out a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is important to follow specific guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here are five things to do and not to do:

• Do: Ensure all names are written in the correct format, including last name, first name, and middle initial.
• Do: Double-check the Social Security Number (SSN) or Department of Defense (DOD) ID number for accuracy.
• Do: Fill in all required fields, especially those marked with an asterisk (*) to avoid delays.
• Do: Review the performance evaluation sections carefully, providing clear and specific comments.
• Do: Sign and date the form in the appropriate sections to validate the information provided.

• Don't: Leave any sections blank; incomplete forms may be rejected or returned.
• Don't: Use abbreviations or acronyms that are not widely recognized, as this may lead to confusion.
• Don't: Forget to include the email addresses for the rater and senior rater, as this is essential for communication.
• Don't: Alter the format of the form; stick to the prescribed layout to maintain uniformity.
• Don't: Submit the form without a thorough review to ensure all information is accurate and complete.

1. Incorrect Personal Information: Failing to accurately fill in the name, SSN, or rank can lead to significant issues. Ensure all details are correct and match official records.

2. Missing Dates: Not providing the required dates, such as the date of rank or period covered, can result in delays or rejections of the form.

3. Improper Email Addresses: Using personal email addresses instead of the required .gov or .mil addresses for raters and senior raters can cause communication issues.

4. Omitting Counseling Dates: Not including the initial and later counseling dates can undermine the evaluation process. All counseling dates must be documented.

5. Incomplete Duty Descriptions: Failing to provide a detailed description of daily duties and areas of special emphasis can lead to misunderstandings about the rated NCO's responsibilities.

6. Inaccurate Performance Evaluations: Providing vague or inaccurate assessments in the performance evaluation section can misrepresent the rated NCO's capabilities and achievements.

7. Neglecting Signature Requirements: Not obtaining the required signatures from the rater, senior rater, or supplementary reviewer can render the form invalid.

8. Failure to Use Correct Codes: Misusing nonrated codes or status codes can lead to confusion regarding the rated NCO's evaluation status.

9. Ignoring the Appeals Process: Not acknowledging or understanding the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3 can limit an NCO's ability to contest an unfavorable evaluation.

10. Not Reviewing the Completed Report: Failing to review the completed report before signing can result in agreeing to inaccuracies. It's essential to verify all information is correct.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the Army. When completing this form, several other documents may also be necessary to provide a comprehensive evaluation. Below is a list of commonly used forms and documents that often accompany the DA Form 2166-9-1.

• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It documents counseling sessions between a leader and an NCO. It outlines performance issues, goals, and development plans, helping to guide the NCO's growth.
• Mobile Home Bill of Sale: This form is important for facilitating the transfer of ownership of a mobile home. Proper documentation can be found through Forms Washington, ensuring compliance and clarity in the transaction.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the NCO Evaluation Report. It provides a detailed assessment of an NCO's performance and potential. It complements the DA Form 2166-9-1 and may be used for different ranks or situations.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is essential for evaluating an NCO’s physical readiness and overall fitness, which is a key component of their performance evaluation.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used to measure body composition. They are important for ensuring that NCOs meet Army weight standards, which can impact their evaluation and career progression.
• DA Form 201: This is the Military Personnel Record Jacket. It contains the NCO's official records, including previous evaluations, awards, and training. It provides a complete picture of the NCO's career.
• AR 623-3: This Army Regulation outlines policies and procedures for NCO evaluations. It provides guidance on how to properly complete the DA Form 2166-9-1 and other related documents.

Using these forms and documents together with the DA Form 2166-9-1 ensures a thorough and fair evaluation process for NCOs. Each document serves a specific purpose and contributes to a clearer understanding of an NCO's performance and potential within the Army.

Understanding the DA Form 2166-9-1 is crucial for service members, especially those involved in evaluations. However, several misconceptions persist about this important document. Here are five common misunderstandings:

• Misconception 1: The form is only for negative evaluations.

This is not true. The DA Form 2166-9-1 is designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of an NCO's performance, which can include both strengths and areas for improvement. It is not solely a tool for documenting failures.

• Misconception 2: Only the rater completes the form.

In reality, both the rater and senior rater contribute to the evaluation. Their insights provide a well-rounded view of the NCO’s performance. The rated NCO also has a role, particularly in verifying the accuracy of the administrative data.

• Misconception 3: The signature of the rated NCO indicates agreement with the evaluation.

The signature does not imply agreement or disagreement. Instead, it confirms that the rated NCO has reviewed the document and acknowledges the accuracy of the administrative data and counseling dates.

• Misconception 4: The form is not important for career advancement.

This is a significant misconception. The evaluations recorded on the DA Form 2166-9-1 can greatly impact an NCO’s career trajectory. They are often considered during promotion boards and assignments.

• Misconception 5: Once submitted, the evaluation cannot be changed.

While it is true that changes are not common, there is an appeals process available. If an NCO believes there has been an error or unfair assessment, they can follow the procedures outlined in AR 623-3 to address their concerns.

Being aware of these misconceptions can empower NCOs to engage more effectively with their evaluations. Understanding the DA Form 2166-9-1 is essential for personal and professional growth within the military.

Here are some key takeaways about filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form:

• Administrative Data: Ensure all personal information is accurate in Part I, including name, SSN, rank, and unit details.
• Submission Reason: Clearly state the reason for submission. This helps clarify the purpose of the evaluation.
• Rater and Senior Rater: Include complete information for both the rater and senior rater, including signatures and email addresses.
• Performance Evaluation: The evaluation should reflect the rated NCO’s performance in various categories, such as character and presence.
• Counseling Dates: Record all counseling dates accurately. This shows that the rated NCO has received feedback throughout the evaluation period.
• Duty Description: Provide a clear and detailed description of daily duties and special emphasis areas in Part III.
• APFT Information: Include accurate APFT results, height, and weight. Comments are necessary if standards are not met.
• Overall Performance: The rater must provide an overall assessment of the rated NCO's performance and potential.
• Signatures: Remember that the rated NCO’s signature does not indicate agreement with the evaluation but confirms the accuracy of the information provided.
• Appeals Process: Familiarize yourself with the appeals process as outlined in AR 623-3. It’s important for understanding how to address any concerns.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Several other forms share similarities with it in terms of purpose and structure. Here are six such documents:

• DA Form 67-9: This form is used for Officer Evaluation Reports (OER). Like the DA 2166-9-1, it assesses performance and potential but is tailored for officers instead of NCOs.
• DA Form 1059: This document serves as an Academic Evaluation Report. It evaluates performance in military education courses, similar to how the DA 2166-9-1 evaluates NCOs in their duties.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, it documents counseling sessions for soldiers. Both forms emphasize performance feedback and developmental goals.
• DA Form 2166-9-2: This is the NCO Evaluation Report for SSG and above. It follows a similar format to the DA 2166-9-1 but is designed for higher-ranking NCOs.
• Durable Power of Attorney Form: This important document allows individuals to designate an agent to make decisions on their behalf, remaining effective even if they become incapacitated. For more information, visit californiadocsonline.com/durable-power-of-attorney-form.
• DA Form 250: The Individual Training Record captures training and qualifications. Both forms track a soldier's progress and readiness, albeit in different contexts.
• DA Form 638: This is the recommendation for award form. It highlights achievements and performance, paralleling the evaluation aspect of the DA 2166-9-1.